Google Advertisement

Employee Put on PIP for Refusing Work During Approved Leave; Sparks Workplace Rights Debate

Google Advertisement
🔥 Read with Full Features on Our Website

An employee claims they were placed on a PIP for refusing to work during approved leave, highlighting growing concerns over toxic work environments and lack of employee rights.

Published on 28 Apr 2025
By Naresh Kumar

An employee’s Reddit post has gone viral after they alleged that they were placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for refusing to work during their approved earned leave (EL). The incident has ignited fresh debate around toxic workplace cultures and the legal rights of employees.

Manager Expected Work Even During Approved Leaves

🔥 Read with Full Features on Our Website

According to the employee, who works at a company where only Sundays are designated as official off days, managers often demanded an additional 5-6 hours of work on off-days to meet tight deadlines. The employee described a situation where they had applied for and eventually secured four days of earned leave after “a lot of debate.”

However, despite the leave being formally approved, the employee’s manager insisted that they continue to work during their time off.

"My manager told me to ensure that I finish my targets during my EL whenever I could," the employee said in their Reddit post, titled “Put on PIP because I had refused to work on my weekend and leaves.”

"I told him it wouldn't be possible for me to work during that time, as I would be travelling throughout."

Google Advertisement

Despite clearly communicating their inability to work during leave, the employee returned to find a stark shift in their manager's behavior, which soon culminated in a call from HR placing them on PIP for "subpar performance."

PIP Used as Punishment?

The employee expressed frustration over being punished for asserting their right to rest during approved leave:

"All this just because I refused to work during my leave. This is just so messed up that I can't understand how it can legally even happen."

They questioned whether organizations had unchecked power over employees and sought advice from the Reddit community, noting that switching jobs would not be easy after having joined the company only five months ago.

Internet Reacts: Call for Stronger Employee Protections

The post quickly gathered traction, with many users sympathizing and suggesting possible courses of action:

One user advised:

"Avoid Indian startups like the plague. They are all toxic. Bigger organizations at least give you central policies and some HR protection."

The situation highlights a troubling pattern in modern workplaces: employees being pushed beyond reasonable limits, often without any real legal recourse.

Legal Standpoint: What Can Employees Do?

Google Advertisement

In India, The Shops and Establishments Act and various labor laws provide for earned leaves and protection against unfair labor practices. Placing an employee on a PIP simply for not working during sanctioned leave could potentially be challenged as constructive dismissal or unfair labor practice, depending on the evidence and circumstances.

Employees facing such situations can:

However, given the slow pace of labor disputes in India, many workers are forced to make the painful decision to change jobs rather than fight prolonged legal battles.

Conclusion: A Call for Change

This case is another stark reminder of the urgent need for stronger enforcement of employee rights and better workplace regulations. Approved leaves must be respected as non-negotiable — not just for legal compliance, but for the mental health and well-being of employees.

Until systemic reforms are made, workers will continue to face the difficult choice between standing up for their rights and risking career setbacks — or staying silent and enduring toxic workplace cultures.

❤️ Like 💬 Comment 🔗 Share
Google Advertisement
👉 View Full Version on Main Website ↗
Google Advertisement
👉 Read Full Article on Website